Subject	duh! (n/m)
Posted by	LJZTT on March 19, 2010 at 8:44 AM
	This message has been viewed 47 times.
In Reply To	2+2 looks awkward. 2+0 > 2+2 (n/m) posted by Optima on March 19, 2010 at 01:42 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Theirs not a difference in rear bumpers from the coupe and.. - 300zx_2+2 20:31:41 03/18/10 there iz (n/m) - nissansx 20:34:13 03/18/10 whats different? (n/m) - 300zx_2+2 20:36:26 03/18/10 dimensions.....size, length, design, (n/m) - nissansx 20:38:06 03/18/10 oh i see. im really liking the TwinZ Design Type Two.. - 300zx_2+2 20:42:36 03/18/10 Keyword "If"... - Optima 01:41:14 03/19/10 Whose? (n/m) - bstyleZ 21:20:14 03/18/10 TwinZ Design you can find it at z1motorsports... - 300zx_2+2 21:28:24 03/18/10 wooOOOSH! (n/m) - bstyleZ 21:59:37 03/18/10 that was a mach 3 flyby (n/m) - ZiNnYc 06:50:59 03/19/10 lol - indeed. (n/m) - Z_Cherub 08:15:26 03/19/10 False. - Bernie (NoVA) 22:18:17 03/18/10 Re: False. - draker 23:51:57 03/18/10 2+2 shell *is* longer (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 00:00:59 03/19/10 2+2 looks awkward. 2+0 > 2+2 (n/m) - Optima 01:42:22 03/19/10 duh! (n/m) - LJZTT 08:44:11 03/19/10 correct (n/m) - aliaZ 09:21:06 03/19/10 False - njz 12:03:41 03/19/10 thanks for proving Optima's point (n/m) - Guapo 12:10:47 03/19/10 indeed - aliaZ 12:13:09 03/19/10 It was shot on a Nikon. One can only expect so much. :) (n/m) - Guapo 13:14:08 03/19/10 To each his own - njz 12:14:24 03/19/10 Re: thanks for proving Optima's point - njz 13:03:51 03/19/10 Corrected: 2+0 looks awkward. 2+2 > 2+0 (n/m) - jschrauwen 12:42:28 03/19/10 after having owned a 2+2 and a 2+0 - Ahmed (Chicago) 13:07:45 03/19/10 incorrect (n/m) - aliaZ 13:16:26 03/19/10 :) It's all good (n/m) - jschrauwen 23:00:28 03/19/10 2nd, with aftermarket mods. - ZiNnYc 10:22:22 03/20/10 its elegant, like the girl from precious at the oscars (n/m) - dpjax 18:48:51 03/20/10 fat girls need lovin too (n/m) - ZiNnYc 23:40:27 03/20/10 I iz a americAn (n/m) - ZiNnYc 06:50:21 03/19/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.